His work has even appeared on the front page of Reddit.Īrticles he's written have been used as a source for everything from books like Team Human by Douglas Rushkoff, media theory professor at the City University of New York's Queens College and CNN contributor, to university textbooks and even late-night TV shows like Comedy Central's with Chris Hardwick. His roundups of new features in Windows 10 updates have been called "the most detailed, useful Windows version previews of anyone on the web" and covered by prominent Windows journalists like Paul Thurrott and Mary Jo Foley on TWiT's Windows Weekly. Instructional tutorials he's written have been linked to by organizations like The New York Times, Wirecutter, Lifehacker, the BBC, CNET, Ars Technica, and John Gruber's Daring Fireball. The news he's broken has been covered by outlets like the BBC, The Verge, Slate, Gizmodo, Engadget, TechCrunch, Digital Trends, ZDNet, The Next Web, and Techmeme. Beyond the column, he wrote about everything from Windows to tech travel tips. He founded PCWorld's "World Beyond Windows" column, which covered the latest developments in open-source operating systems like Linux and Chrome OS. He also wrote the USA's most-saved article of 2021, according to Pocket.Ĭhris was a PCWorld columnist for two years. Beyond the web, his work has appeared in the print edition of The New York Times (September 9, 2019) and in PCWorld's print magazines, specifically in the August 2013 and July 2013 editions, where his story was on the cover. ![]() With over a decade of writing experience in the field of technology, Chris has written for a variety of publications including The New York Times, Reader's Digest, IDG's PCWorld, Digital Trends, and MakeUseOf. Chris has personally written over 2,000 articles that have been read more than one billion times-and that's just here at How-To Geek. ![]() If only a few antivirus programs have a problem with the file, it may well be a false positive - this doesn't guarantee the file is actually safe, it's just a piece of evidence to consider.Ĭhris Hoffman is the former Editor-in-Chief of How-To Geek. If most antivirus programs say there's a problem, the file is probably malicious. They'll automatically scan the file with a wide variety of different antivirus programs and tell you what each says about the file. Head to the VirusTotal website and upload the suspect file or enter an URL where it can be found online. That's where VirusTotal comes in - it lets us scan a file with 45 antivirus programs so we can see what they all think of it. In other words, if this is a false positive, only a few antivirus programs should flag the file as dangerous, while most should say it's safe. If you've run into a false positive and the file is actually safe, most other antivirus programs shouldn't make the same mistake. Switching SNORM to 0.0 will probably give more inaccurate results and worse rigid body behaviour so is not a good approach.If you download a file and your antivirus jumps into action and informs you the file is harmful, it probably is. Check your constraint forces for poor Autospc constraints and use the GROUNDCHECK case control request to verify your rigid body conditioning. it implies that you have significant loads being reacted through the plate normal rotation direction, In a model where you have significant differences between 70. In crude engineering terms this is like smoothing out the facets. ![]() The drilling direction is then removed by AUTOSPC with no problems and no large stiffness ratios. Is a bad thing) SNORM takes these elements and rotates the stiffnesses so that they use a common average normal. This causes the stiffness ratio problems. This means that the drilling direction on one element couples with bending in adjacent elements on a curved plate. The reason for using SNORM is that we are modelling smooth curved surfaces as facets. If you want and like the results of 70.7 but wants to run 2001, then I suggest using the parameter snorm set to 0.0.Ģ. However, 70.7 has a larger matrix to factor diagonal ratio of 2.8E+07. If param,snorm,0.0 is used for version 2001, it yields the same result as 70.7. Spirit, i have forwarded your question to MSC and get following comments :ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |